PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
447.27%
Positive operating income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-240.38%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-240.64%
Negative EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 83.05%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-240.64%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 83.05%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.29%
Share reduction while 0259.HK is at 932.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.29%
Reduced diluted shares while 0259.HK is at 932.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.29%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0259.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36886.77%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 52.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
77774.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 21.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
49695.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 2.82%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-1313.32%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-579.30%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-2099.45%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-993.88%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-1437.92%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-678.14%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.16%
AR growth of 4.16% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
35.28%
Inventory growth of 35.28% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
19.16%
Asset growth of 19.16% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
6.99%
BV/share growth of 6.99% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
10.37%
Debt growth of 10.37% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.