PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.88%
Revenue growth of 11.88% while 0259.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
23.89%
Gross profit growth of 23.89% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
59.63%
EBIT growth of 59.63% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
-38.44%
Negative operating income growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
219.72%
Net income growth of 219.72% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
198.30%
EPS growth of 198.30% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
198.30%
Diluted EPS growth of 198.30% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
22.30%
Share change of 22.30% while 0259.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
22.30%
Diluted share change of 22.30% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-43.99%
Dividend reduction while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
381.08%
OCF growth of 381.08% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can expand into a larger competitive lead.
145.50%
FCF growth of 145.50% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest improvements in free cash can accelerate further.
16816.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 52.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
47366.88%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 21.10%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
213.79%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 2.82%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
1724.05%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
6099.74%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
897.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
635.38%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
1201.11%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
98.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0259.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-18.12%
Inventory is declining while 0259.HK stands at 11.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
6.87%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0259.HK's 229.08%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
0.11%
Under 50% of 0259.HK's 252.16%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-43.27%
We’re deleveraging while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
30.23%
SG&A growth of 30.23% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.