PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.53%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 9.31%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
1.99%
Positive gross profit growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-6.32%
Negative EBIT growth while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-6.80%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.56%
Positive net income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
7.45%
Positive EPS growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
7.45%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.52%
Share count expansion well above 0259.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-50.91%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-79.42%
Negative OCF growth while 0259.HK is at 110.18%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.03%
Negative FCF growth while 0259.HK is at 212.84%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53805.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 171.25%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
193.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-14.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 78.34%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1287.21%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 352.41%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
347.63%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
202.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0259.HK's 2373.32%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
314.20%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 59.56% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-1.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
148.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0259.HK's 164.34%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 117.25%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.59%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0259.HK invests at 399.98%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.27%
We show growth while 0259.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-10.76%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.50%
Positive BV/share change while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
26.07%
We have some new debt while 0259.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0259.HK's 9.52%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.