PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
7.83%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 0259.HK's 10.78%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
2.90%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 22.29%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
6.20%
Positive EBIT growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
35.35%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 0259.HK's 49.58%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
-19.07%
Negative net income growth while 0259.HK stands at 35.73%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-9.25%
Negative EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 35.66%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-5.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is at 35.66%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-10.94%
Share reduction while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-14.43%
Reduced diluted shares while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
349.14%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0259.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-29.11%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-271.62%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
82239.74%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 200.49%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
44.10%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
12.96%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0259.HK's 97.57%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
565.21%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 23.27%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
-83.91%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-64.35%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 719.42%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
467.39%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 116.57% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-50.51%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0259.HK is 0.51%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-54.74%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is 187.33%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
104.46%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-29.68%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-88.67%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0259.HK invests at 24.99%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.99%
Inventory is declining while 0259.HK stands at 15.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-1.78%
Negative asset growth while 0259.HK invests at 9.43%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
18.40%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 4.29%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-30.04%
We’re deleveraging while 0259.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.76%
We cut SG&A while 0259.HK invests at 12.38%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.