PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
16.70%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 5.34%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
15.77%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of 0259.HK's 22.65%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
105.96%
EBIT growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 8.59%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
105.96%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 8.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
322.84%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 31.41%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
330.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 31.32%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
344.83%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 31.32%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-1.33%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-5.02%
Reduced diluted shares while 0259.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
120.51%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 2.78%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
276.82%
Positive FCF growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
87778.82%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 212.26%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
13.18%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0259.HK's 614.97%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
40.90%
3Y revenue/share CAGR similar to 0259.HK's 44.29%. Walter Schloss would assume both companies experience comparable short-term cycles.
4300.92%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 97.14%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
1020.89%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 128.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
4574.68%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
660.42%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 141.97% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-48.70%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0259.HK is 116.26%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-43.92%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
538.69%
Equity/share CAGR of 538.69% while 0259.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
104.48%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-91.11%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
46.46%
Below 50% of 0259.HK's 499.97%. Michael Burry suspects the firm invests elsewhere or can’t match the competitor’s dividend policy.
3.48%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0259.HK's 11.14%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
21.91%
Inventory growth well above 0259.HK's 20.19%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
2.59%
Asset growth well under 50% of 0259.HK's 6.62%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
18.28%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 3.79%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-0.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
314.74%
We increase R&D while 0259.HK cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
4.92%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0259.HK's 30.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.