PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
18.56%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 0259.HK's 13.51%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
9.40%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0259.HK's 46.82%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
21.32%
EBIT growth 50-75% of 0259.HK's 34.20%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
21.32%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 0259.HK's 34.20%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
66.19%
Positive net income growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
67.59%
Positive EPS growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
67.59%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
-0.74%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
-0.67%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-166.08%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-816.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
47933.84%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 174.34%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
1.19%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0259.HK's 126.53%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
9.55%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0259.HK's 38.84%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-4802.15%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 107.57%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-181.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK is at 1260.48%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-137.36%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 7.29%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
387.58%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-73.88%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0259.HK is 212.42%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-43.89%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0259.HK is 57.71%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
152.38%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
54.75%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0259.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-87.59%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0259.HK stands at 699.96%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
141.46%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x 0259.HK's 60.00%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
24.83%
AR growth well above 0259.HK's 20.34%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-12.51%
Inventory is declining while 0259.HK stands at 8.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
21.68%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 3.62%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
1.64%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0259.HK's 0.15%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
281.70%
We have some new debt while 0259.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
75.26%
We increase R&D while 0259.HK cuts. John Neff sees a short-term profit drag but a potential lead in future innovations.
7.69%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0259.HK's 56.92%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.