0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-37.54%
Negative revenue growth while 0335.HK stands at 504.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-12.80%
Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 511.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
92.45%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0335.HK's 907.69%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
92.43%
Operating income growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 540.80%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
82.70%
Positive net income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
82.62%
Positive EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
82.62%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
73.32%
OCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 227.47%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
71.94%
FCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 234.54%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
24.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 79.12%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
46.64%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 160.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
46.64%
3Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 78.67%. Martin Whitman would suspect weaker recent execution or product competitiveness.
65.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.40%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
65.40%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-69.55%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.