0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-57.73%
Negative revenue growth while 0335.HK stands at 504.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-57.73%
Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 511.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-513.63%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 907.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-513.63%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 540.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-238.98%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-239.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-239.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
473.30%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 227.47%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
434.86%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 234.54%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-47.19%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-47.19%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-47.19%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
299.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 79.12%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
299.19%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 160.73%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
299.19%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 78.67%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
-17.28%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-17.28%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-17.28%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.