PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
447.27%
Operating income growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 196.56%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
-240.38%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-240.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-240.64%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-0.29%
Share reduction while 0335.HK is at 2.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.29%
Reduced diluted shares while 0335.HK is at 2.34%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
0.29%
Dividend growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 18.02%. Michael Burry might suspect more pressing needs for cash or weaker earnings power.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36886.77%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
77774.65%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 541.01%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
49695.23%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 79.30%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
-1313.32%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-579.30%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 113.98%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-2099.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 140.48%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-993.88%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-1437.92%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is 7.56%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-678.14%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
4.16%
AR growth of 4.16% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
35.28%
Inventory growth of 35.28% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
19.16%
Asset growth of 19.16% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
6.99%
BV/share growth of 6.99% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
10.37%
Debt growth of 10.37% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.