Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Positive revenue growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.

Positive gross profit growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.

EBIT growth of 6.20% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.

Operating income growth 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 28.53%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strategic measures (e.g., cost cutting, product mix) are succeeding.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Share reduction while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0335.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.

Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.

Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.

Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.

Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 25.01%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

BV/share growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 11.08%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.

Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.