PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.52%
Negative revenue growth while 0335.HK stands at 84.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.64%
Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 84.70%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-43.49%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 79.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-40.57%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 28.73%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-82.23%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 798.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-80.89%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 791.94%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-82.21%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 791.94%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-7.43%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
0.01%
Diluted share change of 0.01% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0335.HK stands at 125.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
364.22%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 172.83%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
237.08%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 172.06%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
75929.25%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
33.05%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
4.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2432.89%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-19.33%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
78.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
170.51%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
118.16%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0335.HK's 145.17%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
158.20%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 142.92%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 240.50% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
102.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 26.62%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 142.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0335.HK invests at 260.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.56%
Inventory growth of 72.56% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.91%
Negative asset growth while 0335.HK invests at 13.07%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
9.36%
50-75% of 0335.HK's 13.15%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
24.71%
Debt growth of 24.71% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-71.23%
Our R&D shrinks while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.54%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0335.HK's 10.91%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.