PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.54%
Positive revenue growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
-15.02%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-30.53%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-30.53%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
2.50%
Positive net income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
0.99%
Positive EPS growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
-4.19%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.44%
Share count expansion well above 0335.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
7.00%
Diluted share change of 7.00% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
39.94%
OCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 565.44%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
37.76%
FCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 565.25%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
247.66%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
19.94%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-10.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 14.02%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-6520.63%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 278.28%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-394.38%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 7731.62%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-261.16%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 92.14%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
17.38%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
27.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
59.09%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 27.99%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
97.28%
5Y equity/share CAGR is in line with 0335.HK's 98.16%. Walter Schloss would see parallel mid-term profitability and retention policies.
6.65%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 63.97%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
578.71%
5Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 260.00%. David Dodd checks if the firm's mid-term cash flows justify a faster dividend growth rate.
120.50%
3Y dividend/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 0.00%. David Dodd sees a superior short-term capital return strategy if supported by stable earnings.
44.39%
AR growth of 44.39% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-44.69%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
14.57%
Positive asset growth while 0335.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
2.88%
Positive BV/share change while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
206.46%
Debt growth far above 0335.HK's 0.14%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-36.19%
Our R&D shrinks while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-4.02%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.