Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0335.HK stands at 238.28%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 238.28%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 496.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 496.55%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Reduced diluted shares while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 247.64%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 56.77%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is 297.99%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 87.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 13.38%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of 0335.HK's 353.05%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.

Below 50% of 0335.HK's 349.99%. Michael Burry worries the firm returns far less capital to shareholders over 5 years.

3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0335.HK's 80.00%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.

AR growth of 45.51% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.

Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.

Our R&D shrinks while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.