PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.61%
Positive revenue growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
17.91%
Positive gross profit growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
66.33%
Positive EBIT growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
66.33%
Positive operating income growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
-47.50%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 187.19%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-11.19%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 187.35%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-47.67%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 187.35%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-40.81%
Both firms reduce share counts. Martin Whitman would compare buyback intensity relative to free cash flow generation.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
33.34%
OCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 100.20%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
22.09%
FCF growth under 50% of 0335.HK's 100.17%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
30.51%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-1.91%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
16.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-267.39%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-307.51%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
34.33%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0335.HK's 100.22%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
135.80%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 212.05%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
97.13%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 27.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-59.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is 709.22%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
418.24%
Equity/share CAGR of 418.24% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that can compound significantly over 10 years.
52.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 80.97%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
23.32%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 20.73%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
-100.00%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.76%
AR growth of 2.76% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
-3.93%
Inventory is declining while 0335.HK stands at 0.07%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
5.51%
Asset growth at 75-90% of 0335.HK's 6.71%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
69.47%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 6.78%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-22.54%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
97.36%
R&D growth of 97.36% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
9.83%
We expand SG&A while 0335.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.