PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.70 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.66%
Revenue growth 1.25-1.5x 0335.HK's 23.39%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if differentiation or pricing power justifies outperformance.
24.43%
Gross profit growth similar to 0335.HK's 23.41%. Walter Schloss would assume both firms track common industry trends.
-226.33%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 10.60%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-226.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3875.78%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 6129.40%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-3833.33%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 6111.18%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-3833.33%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 6111.18%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
1.06%
Share count expansion well above 0335.HK's 0.02%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0335.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-11.97%
Negative OCF growth while 0335.HK is at 140.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-11.76%
Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 140.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-14.04%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
10.91%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-11.76%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-2249.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 172.45%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-932.93%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
6.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0335.HK's 387.91%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
16.65%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 5528.49%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-645.85%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is 834.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-245.29%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is 1301.64%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
445.96%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 148.93%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
28.11%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 52.51%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 11.06%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.76%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
AR growth of 82.29% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if the firm’s additional AR is warranted by strong revenue or potential risk.
0.89%
We show growth while 0335.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
30.20%
Positive asset growth while 0335.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-8.39%
We have a declining book value while 0335.HK shows 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.09%
We have some new debt while 0335.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
435.21%
R&D growth of 435.21% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
11.64%
We expand SG&A while 0335.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.