Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 738.41%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Diluted share change of 29.28% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.

Dividend reduction while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.

Negative OCF growth while 0335.HK is at 108.55%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 108.62%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 10.12%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 468.30%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 161.05%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 29.03%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 5529.72%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is 441.92%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is 7231.89%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0335.HK's 152.58%. Bill Ackman would push for either higher ROE or more earnings retention to catch the competitor.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 22.22%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 12.10%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0335.HK stands at 14.28%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.

Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.

Firm’s AR is declining while 0335.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

Inventory growth well above 0335.HK's 0.07%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.

We have a declining book value while 0335.HK shows 0.55%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Our R&D shrinks while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.