PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-25.95%
Negative revenue growth while 0335.HK stands at 21.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-48.58%
Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 21.19%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-122.15%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 53.71%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-122.15%
Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 574.96%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-112.71%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-111.92%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-111.92%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
5.84%
Slight or no buybacks while 0335.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
5.85%
Diluted share change of 5.85% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-1.18%
Dividend reduction while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
21.66%
Positive OCF growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
22.08%
Positive FCF growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-40.24%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-52.05%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
20.63%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-6853.77%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 212.49%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-29.54%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-75.23%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 157.10%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-114.02%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 4291.06%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-118.06%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is 7666.21%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-148.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK is 3978.88%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
90.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0335.HK's 124.20%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
-2.50%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 22.77%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
38.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 9.03%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-24.01%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0335.HK stands at 100.03%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-60.78%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-60.06%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-20.45%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0335.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
6.44%
Inventory growth of 6.44% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-4.93%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
8.83%
BV/share growth above 1.5x 0335.HK's 0.84%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
7.92%
We have some new debt while 0335.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
15.24%
R&D growth of 15.24% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-27.52%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.