PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.48%
Negative revenue growth while 0335.HK stands at 21.62%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-23.42%
Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 21.65%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-78.76%
Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 1391.45%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-78.76%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-98.53%
Negative net income growth while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-98.40%
Negative EPS growth while 0335.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-98.40%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
0.03%
Slight or no buybacks while 0335.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
0.00%
Diluted share change of 0.00% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
457531.89%
Dividend growth of 457531.89% while 0335.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
40.99%
Positive OCF growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
40.27%
Positive FCF growth while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-67.49%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 117.86%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-15.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-28.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 7.32%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-1697.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 338.95%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-72.92%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 153.21%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-98.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is at 16133.43%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-96.55%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0335.HK is 3978.88%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
100.61%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
38.18%
Below 50% of 0335.HK's 110.46%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
39.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 12.28%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.11%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0335.HK's 4.16%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
-19.39%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0335.HK stands at 149.99%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-55.55%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0335.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.88%
Inventory is declining while 0335.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
1.46%
Positive asset growth while 0335.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.69%
Positive BV/share change while 0335.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.46%
Our R&D shrinks while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-13.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.