Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Negative revenue growth while 0335.HK stands at 504.17%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while 0335.HK is at 511.72%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while 0335.HK is at 907.69%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while 0335.HK is at 540.80%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.

Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.

Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.

Diluted share change of 0.00% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.

Negative OCF growth while 0335.HK is at 227.47%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0335.HK is at 234.54%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.

Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.

Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0335.HK stands at 79.12%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Below 50% of 0335.HK's 160.73%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.

3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0335.HK's 78.67%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.

Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.

Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while 0335.HK stands at 92.05%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0335.HK is at 5.21%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.

Below 50% of 0335.HK's 3.30%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0335.HK stands at 11.11%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

3Y dividend/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0335.HK's 100.00%. Bill Ackman wants overhead or revenue enhancements to match competitor's dividend growth.

Firm’s AR is declining while 0335.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

Inventory growth of 3.59% while 0335.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.

Negative asset growth while 0335.HK invests at 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.

Our R&D shrinks while 0335.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.