0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 18.24%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
100.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-100.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-100.00%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-100.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-100.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
24.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.92%
3Y CAGR of 24.92% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
46.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 46.64% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
65.40%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 31.09% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
65.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0360.HK's 83.27%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
65.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 65.40% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above 0360.HK's 99.77%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.