0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 18.24%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
26.79%
Positive net income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
26.48%
Positive EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
26.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
FCF growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
5.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
5.62%
3Y CAGR of 5.62% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate to a more decisive lead.
498.39%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
498.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
498.39%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 498.39% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
-71.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 31.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-71.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is 83.27%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-71.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0360.HK's 99.77%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.