0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.33%
Revenue growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
2.33%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
104.53%
EBIT growth similar to 0360.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss might infer both firms share similar operational efficiencies.
104.53%
Operating income growth similar to 0360.HK's 100.00%. Walter Schloss would assume both share comparable operational structures.
46.08%
Net income growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
45.88%
EPS growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
45.88%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
218.47%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
217.89%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-70.33%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-70.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-43.82%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
178.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 178.67% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
178.67%
OCF/share CAGR of 178.67% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-60.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
87.70%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 87.70% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
87.70%
Net income/share CAGR of 87.70% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
89.51%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 89.51% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-7.29%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.