0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
50.07%
Revenue growth at 50-75% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Martin Whitman would worry about competitiveness or product relevance.
-10.89%
Negative gross profit growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-1059.04%
Negative EBIT growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-1059.06%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-36.72%
Negative net income growth while 0360.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-34.78%
Negative EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-34.78%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-118.36%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-118.85%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-55.48%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 10.42%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-64.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 10.42%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
21.73%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 10.42%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
85.56%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
72.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
55.81%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
83.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
51.38%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
60.94%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
32.39%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0360.HK's 100.00%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.