PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.40%
Negative revenue growth while 0360.HK stands at 38.66%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-10.04%
Negative gross profit growth while 0360.HK is at 33.61%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-19.66%
Negative EBIT growth while 0360.HK is at 56.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-49.68%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
600.81%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 193.48%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
542.31%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 174.74%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
542.31%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 183.70%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
12.62%
Share count expansion well above 0360.HK's 4.86%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
12.62%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0360.HK's 3.86%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-89.20%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
-90.38%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-143.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
34936.19%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 116.85%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
16839.70%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 105.37%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
11.69%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0360.HK's 83.89%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-62.82%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
283.50%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-96.14%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
204.83%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
59.56%
Below 50% of 0360.HK's 2649.59%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
-27.41%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 312.06%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-32.98%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0360.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-32.62%
Inventory is declining while 0360.HK stands at 12.54%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-6.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
6.12%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
62.93%
We have some new debt while 0360.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.04%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 24.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.