PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
8.69%
Positive revenue growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
27.08%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-3.63%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-26.39%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
3008.70%
Positive net income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2827.27%
Positive EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2827.27%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
3.02%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 19.40%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
3.02%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 18.14%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-52.42%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
2536.42%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 80.23%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
1701.27%
FCF growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 30.42%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
53271.44%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 71.84%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
189.85%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 25.71%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-15.26%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 50.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
5898.47%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
2081.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 71.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
604.15%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
300.18%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-7.74%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-35.85%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
245.28%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 55.38%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.11%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-100.00%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
1.95%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
23.69%
Positive asset growth while 0360.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-1.08%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-35.87%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-100.00%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
34.88%
SG&A growth well above 0360.HK's 45.32%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.