PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.53%
Revenue growth of 1.53% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
1.99%
Gross profit growth of 1.99% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-6.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.80%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 234.37%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
7.56%
Net income growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 18.78%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.45%
EPS growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 19.23%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.45%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 19.23%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
0.52%
Share count expansion well above 0360.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
0.52%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0360.HK's 0.00%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-50.91%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-79.42%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.03%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53805.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 243.68%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
193.45%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 30.41%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
-14.66%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 49.84%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1287.21%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
347.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 70.77%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
202.92%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
314.20%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
-1.05%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
148.76%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.26%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.59%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.27%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-10.76%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
2.50%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
26.07%
Debt shrinking faster vs. 0360.HK's 97.05%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
SG&A growth of 0.73% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.