PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Negative revenue growth while 0360.HK stands at 3.31%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.93%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-38.09%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-38.09%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-46.61%
Negative net income growth while 0360.HK stands at 37.90%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-58.14%
Negative EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 51.11%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-58.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 50.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
27.41%
Share count expansion well above 0360.HK's 27.30%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
27.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0360.HK's 24.50%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-60.86%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 526.38%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-86.70%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 2546.52%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60253.69%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-22.50%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-3.23%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
1252.02%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
382.08%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
1336.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 165.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
334.84%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
115.27%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
911.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
326.15%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
52.13%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-14.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0360.HK shows 126.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
19.80%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-6.28%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-19.68%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-40.86%
We’re deleveraging while 0360.HK stands at 4.50%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-10.61%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.66%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0360.HK's 18.95%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.