PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.80%
Positive gross profit growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
85.33%
Positive EBIT growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
85.33%
Positive operating income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
87.44%
Positive net income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
62.43%
Positive EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
62.43%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
15.43%
Share count expansion well above 0360.HK's 0.40%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
15.37%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0360.HK's 0.48%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-698.01%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 212.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-308.72%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 160.75%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
11795.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-12.09%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-5.77%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-9561.15%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-664.88%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 1141.16%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1361.38%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 398.53%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
233.13%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
384.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-14.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 90.56%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.37%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
62.96%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-18.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0360.HK shows 311.44%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
30.58%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-2.55%
Negative asset growth while 0360.HK invests at 9.50%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.59%
Under 50% of 0360.HK's 7.47%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-99.86%
We’re deleveraging while 0360.HK stands at 9.58%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-35.78%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-46.41%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 28.70%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.