PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
26.24%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 6.37%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
9.27%
Gross profit growth at 50-75% of 0360.HK's 16.81%. Martin Whitman would question if cost structure or brand is lagging.
-4.45%
Negative EBIT growth while 0360.HK is at 151.68%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-4.45%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 151.68%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
23.51%
Net income growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 99.95%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
21.43%
EPS growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
1.69%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 11.80%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
1.59%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 21.09%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.78%
Positive OCF growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
25.16%
Positive FCF growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
21014.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.65%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-3.39%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-9466.85%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-5313.50%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 68.66%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-1349.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 77.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
23.83%
Below 50% of 0360.HK's 99.56%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-22.39%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
13.82%
Below 50% of 0360.HK's 99.99%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
95.36%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
40.98%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
93.73%
Dividend/share CAGR of 93.73% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor advantage in stepping up distributions, even modestly.
84.64%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 84.64% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees a minor positive difference that could attract dividend-focused investors.
47.11%
Our AR growth while 0360.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
-21.61%
Inventory is declining while 0360.HK stands at 10.52%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
22.34%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 4.42%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
4.73%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
1816.96%
We have some new debt while 0360.HK reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
80.16%
R&D growth of 80.16% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
47.97%
We expand SG&A while 0360.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.