PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.84%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
17.03%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 0360.HK's 10.11%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
39.17%
Positive EBIT growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
39.17%
Positive operating income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
12.12%
Positive net income growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
13.73%
EPS growth of 13.73% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
13.73%
Diluted EPS growth of 13.73% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-1.45%
Share reduction while 0360.HK is at 8.30%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.36%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-140.53%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 86.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-128.18%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 19.40%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
48403.57%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
21.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2.09%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-54872.48%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 66.59%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-12824.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 96.18%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-708.35%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 95.06%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
231.68%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
3699.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
574.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 84.24%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.16%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
39.07%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0360.HK shows 226.94%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
15.68%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-13.03%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
7.65%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2122.61%
Debt growth far above 0360.HK's 3.54%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-25.80%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
25.32%
SG&A growth well above 0360.HK's 49.62%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.