PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.96M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
69.45%
Revenue growth of 69.45% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
283.79%
Gross profit growth of 283.79% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
229.63%
EBIT growth of 229.63% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
229.63%
Operating income growth of 229.63% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
183.19%
Net income growth of 183.19% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
171.60%
EPS growth of 171.60% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
171.60%
Diluted EPS growth of 171.60% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
16.23%
Share change of 16.23% while 0360.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
16.16%
Diluted share change of 16.16% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.02%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.95%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-25.20%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-14.92%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
78.46%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-879.87%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-38.06%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-2020.15%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
618.94%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
82.63%
5Y net income/share CAGR at 75-90% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Bill Ackman would advocate improvements to match competitor’s profit expansion.
135.49%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0360.HK's 100.00%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
109.13%
Positive growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-16.14%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
41.33%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-91.69%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.95%
AR growth well above 0360.HK's 16.73%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-33.37%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-10.25%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.50%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-55.61%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-0.41%
Our R&D shrinks while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
71.83%
SG&A growth of 71.83% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.