PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.91M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.16%
Revenue growth of 1.16% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
20.10%
Gross profit growth of 20.10% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
8.18%
EBIT growth of 8.18% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
8.18%
Operating income growth of 8.18% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this modest edge can become significant.
85.09%
Net income growth of 85.09% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
84.38%
EPS growth of 84.38% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
85.94%
Diluted EPS growth of 85.94% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-6.85%
Share reduction while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
1.22%
Diluted share change of 1.22% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
6.96%
Dividend growth of 6.96% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-10.98%
Negative OCF growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-15.47%
Negative FCF growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-35.10%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-46.64%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-44.46%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-8146.73%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
36.76%
Below 50% of 0360.HK's 100.00%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
-85.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
-196.54%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-102.54%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-108.70%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0360.HK is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
88.86%
Positive growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
-3.72%
Both show negative equity/share growth mid-term. Martin Whitman suspects cyclical or structural challenges for each company.
-12.03%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0360.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-18.72%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.37%
Our AR growth while 0360.HK is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
20.84%
We show growth while 0360.HK is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
2.58%
Positive asset growth while 0360.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
5.91%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-3.03%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
146.15%
R&D growth of 146.15% while 0360.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if the moderate investment leads to meaningful product differentiation.
-18.01%
We cut SG&A while 0360.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.