PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-19.48%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-23.42%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-78.76%
Negative EBIT growth while 0360.HK is at 81.65%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-78.76%
Negative operating income growth while 0360.HK is at 81.65%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-98.53%
Negative net income growth while 0360.HK stands at 82.96%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-98.40%
Negative EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 92.86%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-98.40%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0360.HK is at 92.68%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
0.03%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 133.40%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.00%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0360.HK's 132.74%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
457531.89%
Dividend growth of 457531.89% while 0360.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
40.99%
OCF growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 191.40%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
40.27%
FCF growth under 50% of 0360.HK's 185.21%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-67.49%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-15.33%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-28.41%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-1697.85%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 149.14%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-72.92%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 1955.41%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
34.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0360.HK's 216.38%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
-98.53%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0360.HK is at 99.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-96.55%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
100.61%
3Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0360.HK's 99.50%. Walter Schloss would attribute it to shared growth factors or demand patterns.
38.18%
Positive growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff might see a strong advantage in steadily compounding net worth over a decade.
39.20%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0360.HK's 5.27%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.11%
Positive short-term equity growth while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a strong advantage in near-term net worth buildup.
-19.39%
Cut dividends over 10 years while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.
-55.55%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0360.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.54%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0360.HK shows 9.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-10.88%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.46%
Positive asset growth while 0360.HK is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
0.69%
Positive BV/share change while 0360.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.75%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-3.46%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-13.08%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.