0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.34M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
100.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-100.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 248.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-100.00%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 34.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 34.10%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 34.10%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
24.92%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
24.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
46.64%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 153.62%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.40%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
65.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 29.75%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
65.40%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 402.41%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
We expand SG&A while 0376.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.