PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0376.HK's 4.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 248.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-0.00%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 34.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
0.77%
EPS growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 34.10%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
0.77%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 34.10%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.84%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
149.84%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
149.84%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-6.72%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 153.62%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-6.72%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-6.72%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
30.80%
Positive 10Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
30.80%
5Y net income/share CAGR similar to 0376.HK's 29.75%. Walter Schloss might see both on parallel mid-term trajectories.
30.80%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 402.41%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.25%
We expand SG&A while 0376.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.