0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-57.73%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-57.73%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-513.63%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 4.24%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-513.63%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 248.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-238.98%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 34.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-239.53%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 34.10%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-239.53%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 34.10%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
473.30%
Positive OCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
434.86%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-47.19%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-47.19%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-47.19%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
299.19%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 153.62%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
299.19%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
299.19%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-17.28%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-17.28%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 29.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-17.28%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 402.41%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-13.40%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.