0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
EBIT growth below 50% of 0376.HK's 4.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
-0.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 248.89%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
26.79%
Net income growth at 75-90% of 0376.HK's 34.23%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
26.48%
EPS growth at 75-90% of 0376.HK's 34.10%. Bill Ackman would push for improved profitability or share repurchases to catch up.
26.48%
Diluted EPS growth at 75-90% of 0376.HK's 34.10%. Bill Ackman would expect further improvements in net income or share count reduction.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
5.62%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
5.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
5.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
498.39%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 153.62%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
498.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
498.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-71.73%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-71.73%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 29.75%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-71.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 402.41%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
We expand SG&A while 0376.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.