0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-20.73%
Negative revenue growth while 0376.HK stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-20.73%
Negative gross profit growth while 0376.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
69.71%
EBIT growth of 69.71% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
69.71%
Positive operating income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
47.02%
Positive net income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
46.25%
Positive EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
46.25%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-103.15%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-103.43%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-71.01%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-71.01%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-76.79%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
33.59%
OCF/share CAGR of 33.59% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
33.59%
OCF/share CAGR of 33.59% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
-24.45%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
77.18%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 77.18% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
77.18%
Net income/share CAGR of 77.18% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
34.04%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 34.04% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.06%
We cut SG&A while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.