0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
39.05%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
12.90%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-9.94%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-81.41%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 34.47%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
251.72%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 33.75%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
251.20%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 37.50%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
251.20%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 37.50%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1004.54%
Dividend growth of 1004.54% while 0376.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-119.58%
Negative OCF growth while 0376.HK is at 40.61%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-155.91%
Negative FCF growth while 0376.HK is at 41.49%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
22933.94%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
77546.68%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
20989.01%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-275.97%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 87.76%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-577.90%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-831.50%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 9.12%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
234.41%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 72.43% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
1192.37%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 45.05%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
74.43%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 24.54%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.02%
Inventory is declining while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
26.81%
Asset growth of 26.81% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz checks if modest expansions can create a longer-term lead.
-7.19%
We have a declining book value while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
31.29%
Debt growth of 31.29% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.29%
SG&A growth of 8.29% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.