PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.53%
Revenue growth of 1.53% while 0376.HK is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a small edge can widen further.
1.99%
Gross profit growth of 1.99% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal improvements could expand further.
-6.32%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-6.80%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
7.56%
Net income growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 1.15%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
7.45%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 0.96%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
7.45%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 0.96%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
0.52%
Share change of 0.52% while 0376.HK is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
0.52%
Diluted share change of 0.52% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
-50.91%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-79.42%
Negative OCF growth while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-89.03%
Negative FCF growth while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
53805.49%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 8.44%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
193.45%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
-14.66%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
1287.21%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 76.60%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
347.63%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 21.22%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
202.92%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 4.39%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
314.20%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 67.21% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
-1.05%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0376.HK is 82.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
148.76%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 39.86%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
199.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 111.74%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-98.59%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
26.27%
Inventory growth of 26.27% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-10.76%
Negative asset growth while 0376.HK invests at 49.46%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
2.50%
Positive BV/share change while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
26.07%
Debt growth of 26.07% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.73%
We expand SG&A while 0376.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.