PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
18.36M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-14.52%
Negative revenue growth while 0376.HK stands at 117.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.64%
Negative gross profit growth while 0376.HK is at 117.86%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-43.49%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-40.57%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 11.62%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-82.23%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 9.13%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-80.89%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-82.21%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 16.67%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-7.43%
Share reduction while 0376.HK is at 5.50%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
0.01%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0376.HK's 6.54%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
364.22%
OCF growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 4.01%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
237.08%
Positive FCF growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
75929.25%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 114.09%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
33.05%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0376.HK's 132.83%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
4.30%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
2432.89%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
-19.33%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 56.80%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
78.77%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
170.51%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 46.29% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
118.16%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 67.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
158.20%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.50%
Equity/share CAGR of 240.50% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor advantage that could compound if the firm maintains positive net worth growth.
102.05%
3Y equity/share CAGR similar to 0376.HK's 110.96%. Walter Schloss sees both having parallel profitability or reinvestment over 3 years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
72.56%
Inventory growth of 72.56% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.91%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
9.36%
Positive BV/share change while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
24.71%
Debt growth of 24.71% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-71.23%
Our R&D shrinks while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.54%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0376.HK's 78.65%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.