PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.79M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-12.49%
Negative revenue growth while 0376.HK stands at 4658.76%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-5.93%
Negative gross profit growth while 0376.HK is at 4658.76%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-38.09%
Negative EBIT growth while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-38.09%
Negative operating income growth while 0376.HK is at 1995.54%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-46.61%
Negative net income growth while 0376.HK stands at 1962.81%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-58.14%
Negative EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 1890.00%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-58.14%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0376.HK is at 1890.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
27.41%
Share count expansion well above 0376.HK's 4.92%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
27.49%
Diluted share count expanding well above 0376.HK's 4.83%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-60.86%
Negative OCF growth while 0376.HK is at 27.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-86.70%
Negative FCF growth while 0376.HK is at 22.23%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
60253.69%
10Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 1671.11%. David Dodd would confirm if management’s strategic vision consistently outperforms the competitor.
-22.50%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 3679.61%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-3.23%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 2388.87%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
1252.02%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
382.08%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 45.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
1336.12%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 59.20%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
334.84%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0376.HK's 592.81%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
115.27%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 964.78%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
911.33%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 5630.77%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
326.15%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 163.67%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
52.13%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 5.66%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
-14.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
19.80%
Inventory growth of 19.80% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-6.28%
Negative asset growth while 0376.HK invests at 351.83%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
-19.68%
We have a declining book value while 0376.HK shows 253.92%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-40.86%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
-10.61%
Our R&D shrinks while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
1.66%
SG&A declining or stable vs. 0376.HK's 421.19%. David Dodd sees better overhead efficiency if it doesn't hamper revenue.