PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.28%
Positive revenue growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.80%
Positive gross profit growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
85.33%
EBIT growth of 85.33% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can be scaled further.
85.33%
Positive operating income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
87.44%
Positive net income growth while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
62.43%
EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 9.09%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
62.43%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x 0376.HK's 9.82%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
15.43%
Share reduction more than 1.5x 0376.HK's 118.33%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
15.37%
Diluted share reduction more than 1.5x 0376.HK's 121.65%. David Dodd would validate if the company is aggressively retiring shares or limiting option exercises.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-698.01%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-308.72%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
11795.63%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
-12.09%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-5.77%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-9561.15%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 104.04%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-664.88%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-1361.38%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 120.86%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
233.13%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 74.17% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
384.15%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
-14.85%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is 18.91%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
149.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0376.HK's 237.88%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
62.96%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 1047.27%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
-18.74%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
30.58%
Inventory growth of 30.58% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-2.55%
Negative asset growth while 0376.HK invests at 273.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if the competitor might capture more market share unless our returns remain higher.
0.59%
Under 50% of 0376.HK's 86.07%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.
-99.86%
We’re deleveraging while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
-35.78%
Our R&D shrinks while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
-46.41%
We cut SG&A while 0376.HK invests at 12.74%. Joel Greenblatt sees a short-term margin benefit but wonders if the competitor invests for future gains.