PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.84%
Negative revenue growth while 0376.HK stands at 206.18%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
17.03%
Gross profit growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 206.18%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
39.17%
EBIT growth 50-75% of 0376.HK's 60.34%. Martin Whitman would suspect suboptimal resource allocation.
39.17%
Operating income growth at 50-75% of 0376.HK's 64.41%. Martin Whitman would doubt the firm’s ability to compete efficiently.
12.12%
Net income growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 56.60%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
13.73%
EPS growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 56.63%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
13.73%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of 0376.HK's 56.63%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-1.45%
Share reduction while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-1.36%
Reduced diluted shares while 0376.HK is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Dividend reduction while 0376.HK stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
-140.53%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-128.18%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
48403.57%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
21.62%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
2.09%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-54872.48%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 87.39%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-12824.71%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK is at 89.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-708.35%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0376.HK stands at 80.92%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
231.68%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 85.57% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
3699.57%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
574.70%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x 0376.HK's 60.86%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
96.16%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
39.07%
Below 50% of 0376.HK's 386.91%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-23.04%
Firm’s AR is declining while 0376.HK shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
15.68%
Inventory growth of 15.68% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz wonders if we anticipate a new wave of demand or risk being stuck with extra product.
-13.03%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
7.65%
Positive BV/share change while 0376.HK is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
2122.61%
Debt growth of 2122.61% while 0376.HK is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees additional leverage that must yield profitable expansions to be worthwhile.
-25.80%
Our R&D shrinks while 0376.HK invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt checks if we risk falling behind a competitor’s new product pipeline.
25.32%
SG&A growth well above 0376.HK's 7.61%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.