0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
100.00%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 8.71%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
100.00%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 11.85%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-100.00%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 19.85%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-100.00%
Negative operating income growth while 0425.HK is at 19.85%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-100.00%
Negative net income growth while 0425.HK stands at 17.12%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-100.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 17.20%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-100.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 17.20%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
24.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 228.55%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
24.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 71.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
24.92%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 67.79%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
46.64%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
46.64%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
46.64%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
65.40%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 116.89%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
65.40%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x 0425.HK's 58.10%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if a better product mix or cost discipline explains the gap.
65.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR 50-75% of 0425.HK's 112.29%. Martin Whitman might see a lagging edge in short-term profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
100.00%
SG&A growth well above 0425.HK's 9.68%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.