Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)

Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Negative net income growth while 0425.HK stands at 32.49%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 32.20%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 32.20%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while 0425.HK is at 23.36%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.

Negative FCF growth while 0425.HK is at 501.46%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 301.08%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 85.78%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 42.33%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 264.25%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 182.29%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 39.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 126.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is 51.86%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.

Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK is 7.18%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.

Below 50% of 0425.HK's 67.71%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

3Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of 0425.HK's 36.47%. Martin Whitman sees a short-term lag in net worth creation vs. the competitor.

Cut dividends over 10 years while 0425.HK stands at 775.75%. Joel Greenblatt suspects a weaker ability to return capital vs. the competitor.

Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 61.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.

Negative near-term dividend growth while 0425.HK invests at 24.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.

Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.

Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.

Under 50% of 0425.HK's 3.14%. Michael Burry raises concerns about the firm’s ability to build intrinsic value relative to its rival.

Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.

Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.