0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
31.66%
Revenue growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 15.30%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
24.43%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 7.38%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-226.33%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-226.33%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-3875.78%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-3833.33%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-3833.33%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.06%
Share count expansion well above 0425.HK's 0.14%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.66%
Maintaining or increasing dividends while 0425.HK cut them. John Neff might see a strong edge in shareholder returns.
-11.97%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-11.76%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-14.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 360.40%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
10.91%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 91.43%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-11.76%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 35.01%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-2249.52%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 246.41%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-932.93%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 80.07%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
6.00%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of 0425.HK's 33.10%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
16.65%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 125.90%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
-645.85%
Negative 5Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is 37.18%. Joel Greenblatt would see fundamental missteps limiting profitability vs. the competitor.
-245.29%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
445.96%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x 0425.HK's 209.50%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
28.11%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 65.37%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-0.65%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 34.37%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
-91.76%
Both reduced dividends long-term. Martin Whitman might check if sector-level headwinds forced universal cuts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
82.29%
AR growth well above 0425.HK's 26.30%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
0.89%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. 0425.HK's 4.69%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
30.20%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 12.37%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-8.39%
We have a declining book value while 0425.HK shows 6.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
50.09%
Debt growth far above 0425.HK's 9.96%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
435.21%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 0425.HK's 19.57%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
11.64%
SG&A growth well above 0425.HK's 22.61%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.