PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.700.02 (-2.78%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
12.80M / 4.66M (Avg.)
35.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-13.40%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-37.16%
Negative gross profit growth while 0425.HK is at 7.76%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-160.18%
Negative EBIT growth while 0425.HK is at 53.57%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-160.18%
Negative operating income growth while 0425.HK is at 53.57%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-2470.86%
Negative net income growth while 0425.HK stands at 10.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-2340.00%
Negative EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 11.76%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-2611.11%
Negative diluted EPS growth while 0425.HK is at 11.76%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
8.64%
Slight or no buybacks while 0425.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.01%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-3.94%
Dividend reduction while 0425.HK stands at 30964397.06%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s cash flow stability or capital allocation decisions.
6.72%
Positive OCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
8.02%
Positive FCF growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-50.96%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 214.52%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-59.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 37.06%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-37.20%
Negative 3Y CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 18.36%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-369.96%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK stands at 11.50%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
8.30%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
36.01%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0425.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-175.70%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0425.HK is at 37.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-159.50%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-1528.07%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
63.91%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 139.08%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-16.92%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 43.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.64%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0425.HK is at 19.34%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
64.08%
Below 50% of 0425.HK's 385.67%. Michael Burry might see weaker long-term distribution growth, raising questions about the firm's capital allocation.
-75.82%
Both lowered dividends mid-term. Martin Whitman might suspect broad sector constraints or strategic shifts from dividends.
-33.71%
Both firms reduced dividends recently. Martin Whitman suspects broader macro or industry issues forcing cost and payout cuts.
1.80%
AR growth is negative/stable vs. 0425.HK's 10.12%, indicating tighter credit discipline. David Dodd confirms it doesn't hamper actual sales.
-26.93%
Inventory is declining while 0425.HK stands at 16.76%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
11.24%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0425.HK's 1.24%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
-11.94%
We have a declining book value while 0425.HK shows 1.13%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
77.55%
Debt growth far above 0425.HK's 2.42%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
-34.23%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-10.18%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.