PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.720.05 (7.46%)
0.67 - 0.72
0.33 - 0.86
15.11M / 4.44M (Avg.)
36.00 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.44%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.98%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-0.35%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-0.35%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
2991.74%
Positive net income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
2880.00%
Positive EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
2860.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.27%
Slight or no buybacks while 0819.HK is reducing shares. John Neff might see a missed opportunity if the company’s stock is cheap.
-0.00%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
100.00%
OCF growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 539.82%. Michael Burry might suspect questionable revenue recognition or rising costs.
100.00%
FCF growth 1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 75.38%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if capex decisions or cost controls create a cash flow advantage.
-66.05%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 253.81%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-69.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 30.23%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-49.38%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-100.00%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
100.00%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
100.00%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
36.90%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 160.15%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
125.08%
Positive 5Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
1534.11%
Positive short-term CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
19.37%
Below 50% of 0819.HK's 496.75%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
-6.83%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 145.56%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-3.85%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while 0819.HK is at 26.72%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while 0819.HK stands at 294.91%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
-100.00%
Negative near-term dividend growth while 0819.HK invests at 19.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
14.65%
AR growth well above 0819.HK's 2.42%. Michael Burry fears inflated revenue or higher default risk in the near future.
-19.50%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.10%
Asset growth above 1.5x 0819.HK's 1.83%. David Dodd checks if M&A or new capacity expansions are value-accretive vs. competitor's approach.
2.88%
1.25-1.5x 0819.HK's 2.35%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's capital management strategies surpass the competitor's approach.
83.53%
Debt growth far above 0819.HK's 29.42%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
18.55%
R&D growth drastically higher vs. 0819.HK's 15.80%. Michael Burry fears near-term margin erosion unless breakthroughs are imminent.
-5.63%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.