PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Wuling Motors Holdings Limited (0305.HK)
0.690.03 (-4.17%)
0.68 - 0.75
0.33 - 0.86
13.06M / 4.66M (Avg.)
34.50 | 0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.00%
Positive revenue growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
0.00%
Positive gross profit growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
0.00%
Positive EBIT growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
-0.00%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
26.79%
Positive net income growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
26.48%
Positive EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
26.48%
Positive diluted EPS growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
FCF growth under 50% of 0819.HK's 75.38%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
5.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 253.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
5.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of 0819.HK's 30.23%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
5.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
498.39%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
498.39%
Positive OCF/share growth while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
498.39%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while 0819.HK is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-71.73%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while 0819.HK is at 160.15%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.
-71.73%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-71.73%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.00%
We expand SG&A while 0819.HK cuts. John Neff might see the competitor as more cost-optimized unless we expect big payoffs from the overhead growth.